March 2026
Articles from Mercy:
- • Voting: Threats to this fundamental right in democracies (Rose Marie Tresp, RSM; Institute Justice Team)
- • Nurturing Justice and Living Faith (Br Ryan W Roberts, OLF; Institute Justice Team)
- • Permitting reform and extractivism (Marianne Comfort; Institute Justice Team)
- • High school student’s reflection on advocacy immersion in Washington, D.C. (Agnes Boyer; Assumption High School, Louisville, KY)
Local Justice News & Upcoming Mercy Events
Justice Resources & Links
Voting: Threats to this fundamental right in democracies
Rose Marie Tresp, RSM; Institute Justice Team
The right to vote is a freedom that is key to American democracy. The right to vote in the United States, until recently, had expanded to allow almost all U.S. citizens over the age of 18 to vote. An exception in some states bars citizens who have been convicted of a felony from voting. In the first presidential election in 1789, only white, property-owning men over 21 could vote. Since then, the struggle to expand the right to vote has resulted first in the inclusion of non–property-owning white men, then all men regardless of race, and eventually women and citizens over 18. Access to voting has been made more accessible by such methods as mail-in voting, early voting, Sunday voting, longer voting hours, and assistance to allow disabled citizens to vote.
More recently, however, increasing efforts are being made to suppress the vote in some states. In 2006, Indiana passed the first strict, photo ID voter requirement, and such laws have since spread to 36 states. The rationale given for strict voter ID was fraud and voting by non-citizens. However, studies by organizations, including the conservative Heritage Center, show minuscule fraud. One such study, covering 25 years of voting in Arizona, showed a minuscule 0.0000845% of votes being fraudulent. Incidents of non-citizens voting are rare as reported in 2020 by the conservative Cato Institute. The penalty for non-citizens voting is severe.
Voter ID laws – especially the strict, government-issued, photo ID laws – do effectively disenfranchise some voters. While proponents argue that this requirement is not burdensome, these laws are partisan and designed to make voting harder for demographic groups who tend to vote for Democrats, including low-income people, People of Color, younger people, and transgender people.
Laws which effectively disenfranchise voters are anti-democratic and may weaken democratic principles and practices. The most stringent effort to disenfranchise voters is the SAVE America Act (and the similar but stalled SAVE Act), passed by the House of Representatives but being held at bay by the Senate’s filibuster. If enacted, it would undermine voter participation in elections, a fundamental tenet of liberal democracies. These bills would block millions of eligible American citizens from voting. The bill would effectively require voters to produce a passport or a birth certificate to register to vote – documents that some 21 million Americans don’t have ready access to. They would also have to show their papers in person, meaning they could no longer register to vote by mail or online. The same process would be required to make any change to a voter’s registration, including name, mailing address, or party affiliation.
One major documentation requirement would be to match your birth certificate with your current photo ID. This would affect transgender persons, married women, some religious sisters, and anyone else who has changed their name since birth. While most middle- and upper-class citizens may not find this burdensome, the process for locating birth certificates and other documents can be difficult, especially for those who move often, do not drive, or have been affected by disasters. The bill’s in-person requirement could disenfranchise 50 million rural voters who would have to travel great distances to register to vote. A detailed explanation of the SAVE Act can be accessed at the Brookings Institution, and the Brennan Center for Justice has published an article on two new versions of the bill being introduced and debated in Congress.
The persistence of misinformation and unproven accusations of fraud in elections have led to mistrust of our election systems. Even credible studies, including one on the 2016 presidential election commissioned by Trump’s Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, have failed to quell growing mistrust in election systems.
Most Americans are ignorant of the processes and protections that make U.S. elections safe, secure, and free from fraud. An article from the American Bar Association, “Understanding American Elections and Why They are Trustworthy,” details how our elections are safe and free of fraud.
There are several ways that individuals can help themselves and others to learn the processes and protections of the election system in their state. You might attend your county Board of Elections meetings. These are open meetings: ask questions, talk to the members of the election board. You could volunteer to work at the polls. You could volunteer to be a poll observer inside of a voting place. (Depending on your state regulations, you may have to be appointed by one of the political parties, since a limited number of viewers can be in the room.)
Finally, mentally review the steps you went through the last time you voted. Try to imagine how a person could vote fraudulently. Remember that your ballot is linked to your address, since there is not a uniform ballot shared by all voters in your state. North Carolina, for example, has over 2000 different ballots. All the ballots in your state will have the same national and statewide sections, but the ballot diverges after that so your ballot reflects what electoral district you are in, what school district, what county, what city and the people running for these offices.
Other articles next month will discuss ways to be involved in the election and protections in our electoral system to prevent fraud.
“The vote is the most powerful instrument ever devised by man for breaking down injustice and destroying the terrible walls which imprison men because they are different from other men.”
—Lyndon B. Johnson, remarks at signing of Voting Rights Act, 06 August 1965
Nurturing Justice and Living Faith
Br Ryan W Roberts, OLF; Institute Justice Team
As part of LCWR’s Another 100 Days of Prayer, Fasting, and Advocacy, the Mercy Justice Team has created a one-week Spirituality Integration Resource for Justice (SIRJ) for reflection on the inextricable connection between faith and justice. While some may claim that the work of justice is an optional addition to the life of faith, this SIRJ helps the reader to delve into the spiritual roots of justice work and to illuminate how justice work flows into and nurtures a deep faith.
This resource, “Nurturing Justice and Living Faith” (Español), comprises a week of focus on the Critical Concern of Women. The Mercy community is encouraged to make use of this guide during March, Women’s History Month. Open the SIRJ once a day for a week to guide a brief time of reflection, perhaps 5 to 10 minutes, on various aspects of the spiritual work of justice for women. Pray by observing a painting by Sister Eva Lallo; read stories of working for justice, receiving mercy, and taking rest; consider the questions of an examen; and practice creativity in telling a story of women.
This one-week SIRJ is the first part of a planned seven-week reflection guide that will expand to cover all of the Critical Concerns. By participating in this week of prayer, fasting, and advocacy, you can also be of assistance to the Institute Justice Team. After spending a week with the SIRJ, we encourage you to reach out with constructive feedback to help us shape future sections as we work toward a complete and revised SIRJ.
May your week for women be blessed, that you may be a blessing in your work for justice!
Permitting reform and extractivism
Marianne Comfort; Institute Justice Team
The Trump Administration and many members of Congress are determined to make it easier to build new energy infrastructure and mine on public land.
One pathway is under the banner of “permitting reform.” While sounding like benign bureaucratic changes, in practice, this approach could reduce public input, weaken environmental protections and limit the ability of communities to sue over projects they fear threaten their health, culture and livelihoods.
A permitting reform bill in 2024 earned bipartisan support for aiming to reduce the time needed to get approvals for fossil fuel projects and solar and wind projects alike. Congress failed to pass the bill.
The current administration and Congress are prioritizing speeding up permitting for fossil fuel projects, while renewable energy projects are being held up or scrapped altogether. That has made many Democratic legislators skeptical of any bills introduced, and negotiations in the Senate stalled until recently.
Similarly, the Trump Administration has taken steps to expand mining on public lands. They seek to overhaul public land management to prioritize mineral exploration, extraction, and processing above all other uses, including recreation and conservation.
Congress is looking to put these directives into law through a variety of mechanisms. One is the Congressional Review Act, which allows legislators to overturn regulations within a certain time period of them being issued. This is being used now to open up land for mining that previous administrations had ruled was off limits.
Congress is also introducing bills to expand mining of minerals deemed “critical” for national security and advanced technology like artificial intelligence (AI). In previous years, these minerals were mostly touted as key for the transition from fossil fuels to a renewable energy economy, but those talking points largely have been replaced by narratives around the need to have secure supply chains for the military and to lessen dependence on China.
Environmental justice is the term used to describe the disproportionate burden caused by pollution and other harms and placed on People of Color and people with low incomes. Organizations and communities concerned about environmental justice fear that these attempts to speed up permitting and mining approvals will gut the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA is a bedrock environmental law that allows federal agencies to analyze the full range of impacts of major federal government actions and projects before issuing approvals.
For more information on the harms of mining, oil and gas drilling and other forms of extractivism, please check out Mercy’s Awakening to a New Consciousness on Extractivism resources.
Featured Guest Writer
High school student’s reflection on advocacy immersion in Washington, D.C.
Agnes Boyer, student at Assumption High School in Louisville, KY
The Institute Justice Team hosted students from Louisville, Kentucky’s Assumption High School February 23–26 in Washington, D.C. Over four packed days, the students met with the Institute Leadership Team; attended a presentation by the Catholic Legal Immigration Network (CLINIC); participated in Faithful Resistance, an interfaith public witness on Capitol Hill; and met with staffers from the offices of Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell and Representative Morgan McGarvey.
Assumption High School student Agnes Boyer wrote to express the students’ gratitude for their time with the Sisters of Mercy and the lasting impact this trip will have on them.

We are seven students from Assumption High School in Louisville, Kentucky. This week, we visited Washington D.C. to learn about the current status of immigration in the U.S. The Sisters of Mercy shared their experiences at the southern border and in cities around the country. Stories of families being afraid to go to grocery stores forced us to face the violence that terrorizes our communities.
Institute Justice Coordinator Jean Stokan introduced us to immigration lawyer Tania Guerrero, who informed us how the current policies affect all migrants. Even when they follow legal procedures, people are still vulnerable to being detained because of how the system is organized. We then heard from Abel Nuñez, executive director at CARECEN. This organization provides direct support and civic engagement in support of the Latino population. He explained the history of Latino immigration to the U.S., specifically in regard to D.C., as well as how it’s becoming increasingly harder to become a naturalized citizen.
On Wednesday, we participated in the faithful resistance led by the United Methodist Church. Moved by words from bishops and reverends who urged us to reclaim our faith as we fight for human rights, we marched to ensure mercy for migrants. On Thursday, we spoke with [staff members from the offices of] Representative Morgan McGarvey and Senator Mitch McConnell in order to urge them to stop funding ICE.
We are extremely grateful to the Sisters of Mercy who welcomed us and provided us with valuable information and contacts. We have had the opportunity to learn and take a stand for an important issue, and we will continue fighting for human decency.
Article Archive
2026
March
Voting: Threats to this fundamental right in democracies
Nurturing Justice and Living Faith
Permitting reform and extractivism
High School student’s reflection on advocacy immersion in Washington, D.C.
February
Critical Considerations:
We have a choice: oligarchy or democracy?
Critical Concerns in Focus: Immigration (español)
Names and naming make a difference in perceptions of reality
January
Critical Considerations:
(click years to expand)
2025
December
The Catholic Church responds to the threat of authoritarianism
Critical Considerations:
The United States: global citizen or global pariah?
November
Critical Considerations:
NSPM-7: Countering or perpetrating political violence?
Advocating on harms of extractive industries
Argentina y el avance del colonialismo / Argentina and the advance of colonialism
October
Critical Considerations:
Is it time to reform the Insurrection Act?
COP 30 in the Amazon & Raising Hope in Rome
The dangers of falsely linking Tylenol to autism
September
Mercy sisters call for urgent defense of immigrants
Critical Considerations:
What is Posse Comitatus all about?
Everyday pilgrimages: the Earth is the Lord’s
August
Critical Considerations:
Are we doomed to a perpetual nuclear arms race?
Love and care of creation in local ecologies
Church document ahead of COP30
July
Critical Considerations:
What’s at stake in Israel’s destruction of Gaza?
Have you heard of Black August?
DEI—Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Mercy Life Gathering in Panama
June
Vampires, Sharecropping, and the Real History of Juneteenth
Protecting Children and Vulnerable Adults from Abuse in the Philippines
Critical Considerations:
What’s really driving border enforcement?
May
Critical Considerations:
April
Critical Considerations:
Water extractivism in Palestine
March
Critical Considerations:
Who benefits from tax cuts? Who pays?
NETWORK webinar on U.S. federal policy
February
National declaration of emergency in Bajo Aguán
Critical Considerations:
Has the United States declared war on immigrants?
January
If you make a mess, clean it up! (Advocacy success in NY)
Youth claim climate victory in Montana court
Critical Considerations:
2024
December
Critical Considerations:
Is the United States becoming a plutocracy?
November
Critical Considerations:
What happened on November 5, 2024?
October
Overturning the Chevron deference
Critical Considerations:
Who are the Israeli settlers and what motivates them?
Assassination of Honduran water protector deeply grieves Sisters of Mercy
September
God walks with his people: National Migration Week September 23–29
Critical Considerations:
What does CEO compensation say about corporate priorities?
Anxiety – election season can heighten it!
August
Critical Considerations:
What is Project 2025 all about?
Working to stop weapon exports to Haiti
Participating in Elections, part 2
July
Critical Considerations:
Is there a better way to spend $91 billion?
Education, Agriculture, & Emigration in the Philippines
Participating in Elections, part 1
June
Critical Considerations:
Are we creating a prison-industrial complex?
Mercy student videos address the Critical Concerns
May
Critical Considerations:
Degrowth is the only sane survival plan
Argentina and the government of hate
Listening to a chorus of voices
April
Critical Considerations:
An Israeli Jesuit reflects on war in the Holy Land
Advocacy Success! Expanded Background Checks for Gun Sales
March
Military spending and national (in)security
February
The challenge Gaza war presents for American Jews
January
Gaza war threatens credibility of West’s commitment to human rights and the rule of law
2023
December
Climate Summit fails to adequately respond to gravity of climate crisis
November
Critical Considerations:
The dangers of conflating Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism
Red flag laws in jeopardy: faith voices speak to save them
October
Jewish and Palestinian perspectives on Gaza crisis
September
U.S. China tensions impact efforts to address climate change
August
When Good Economic Policy Isn’t Enough
July
States Move to Weaken Protections for Child Workers
June
Corporate Lobbyists at Climate Talks
May
Electric Vehicle Transition Challenges
April
Repudiating the Doctrine of Discovery
March
February
The Rise of Christian Nationalism
January
2022
December
How Corporations Took Over the Government
November
The Independent State Legislature Theory Explained
October
Local Justice News & Upcoming Events
Justice Resources & Links
Mercy Justice Resource Pages
- Resources for Immigrants
- Advocacy Amplified! (Mercy Justice Videos on advocacy tools)
- Mercy Walks with Migrants (interviews with Mercy sisters on immigration work)
- Mercy Tips to Care for the Earth









