Everyday Justice magazine - Sisters of Mercy %

June 2025

Articles from Mercy:

Vampires, Sharecropping, and the Real History of Juneteenth (John Charles McAllister-Ashley; Institute Justice Team)
Protecting Children and Vulnerable Adults from Abuse in the Philippines (Helen Libo-on, RSM; Institute Justice Team)
Critical Considerations: What’s really driving border enforcement? (Karen Donahue, RSM)

Local Justice News & Upcoming Mercy Events:

Justice Resources & Links

Vampires, Sharecropping, and the Real History of Juneteenth

John Charles McAllister-Ashley; Institute Justice Team

A reflection on the film Sinners, the legacy of forced labor after slavery, and why Juneteenth still matters today

About a month ago, some friends and I went to go see the Ryan Coogler film Sinners. On the surface, it’s a Black film about blues music and vampires in Mississippi. However, if you watch with a close eye, it goes much deeper. The movie quietly (and sometimes loudly) displayed the horrors of slavery, and how even more than 50 years after the Emancipation Proclamation, many Black people in the South were still trapped in systems that felt a lot like slavery.

Instead of slavery, the new term “sharecropping” was adopted. Unsurprisingly, the effects of generations of atrocities trickled through the Bible belt and beyond. Black people who couldn’t afford to leave the South after slavery ended were stuck doing the same work they had done before, now for pennies. Some were even paid in wooden nickels that could only be used at the plantation’s commissary.

In Sinners, you really get a snapshot of what life was like for poor Black people in southern Mississippi almost 70 years after the Emancipation Proclamation was signed. The majority of the people in that film were sharecroppers working long days in the hot sun for slave wages. And to be clear, this isn’t a critique of the movie. In fact, the opposite. For me, it was a sheer reminder that although slavery ended “on paper,” not all Black people were actually free. Without access to education and better opportunities, staying on the plantation was often the only choice they had.

There is a loophole in the 13th Amendment, which forbids chattel slavery across the United States – except as a form of criminal punishment. When you think about the 13th Amendment justifying slavery for criminals, a lot of petty laws regarding Black people in the southern states begin to make sense. This is the only way the South would survive, as slavery and free labor were the backbone of the economy. The Antebellum South was not going to give up that way of life without introducing anti-Black laws and additional barriers to prevent access to justice for newly freed Black Americans.

Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1st, 1863, but it was not until June 19th,1865 that this news of freedom had reached Galveston, Texas. This is the day that we celebrate – the day when everyone was finally free. This is why Juneteenth is so important to many Black Americans and should be important to all Americans. Similar to the Fourth of July, Juneteenth represents so much more than a day in history. It represents a legacy of what Black people have brought to this country.

In the wise words of the Grandmother of Juneteenth, Opal Lee, “Juneteenth is not a Black holiday, but an American holiday. It is a second Independence Day that reminds us freedom is a journey, not a destination.”

Protecting Children and Vulnerable Adults from Abuse in the Philippines

Helen Libo-on, RSM; Institute Justice Team

Conditions of poverty and other challenges in the Philippines are driving people who might otherwise never consider human trafficking to participate out of desperation, in some cases even exploiting their own family members. This article describes some ongoing efforts to combat child and vulnerable adult abuse in the Philippines, specifically focusing on initiatives undertaken in Northern Mindanao, particularly within the dioceses of Dipolog, Ozamiz, Pagadian, Iligan, and the Prelature of Marawi (DOPIM). The alarming prevalence of child trafficking, exploitation of young women seeking overseas employment, and other forms of abuse necessitates a multi-pronged approach involving community education, collaboration with religious institutions, and engagement with law enforcement.

The primary initiative has been a series of seminars on the Safeguarding of Children and Vulnerable Adults, spearheaded by Sr. Patrocinia Angay, RSM. These seminars address the critical issue of child trafficking, highlighting specific cases such as the exploitation of young girls in areas between Iligan and Cagayan de Oro, and the deceptive recruitment of young women for exploitative work abroad.

The seminars have reached numerous schools, parishes, and church organizations within the DOPIM region, thanks to collaborations with the Diocese of Iligan and the Sisters Association in Mindanao. Furthermore, a meeting of priests and religious leaders included impactful testimonies from participants who had encountered exploited young women in nightclubs, underscoring the pervasive nature of the problem and the need for continued awareness and intervention.

Crucially, these efforts extend beyond religious institutions. Collaboration with local law enforcement agencies, such as the police, is underway to ensure effective reporting and prosecution of perpetrators. This collaborative approach is vital for a comprehensive solution.

While the problem of child and vulnerable adult abuse remains significant, the initiatives outlined here demonstrate a strong commitment to addressing this issue. The combined efforts of religious leaders, community organizations, and law enforcement agencies offer hope for a future where children and vulnerable adults are protected from exploitation and harm. Continued collaboration and expansion of these programs are essential to achieving lasting positive change. Further investigations are underway into the specific locations mentioned and the development of targeted interventions.

Critical Considerations

What’s really driving border enforcement?

Karen Donahue, RSM

Earlier this month, the militarized Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Los Angeles and the subsequent deployment of National Guard personnel and Marines in response to peaceful protests sent shock waves through L.A., California, and the nation. Also in the news at this time, but an item that received much less attention, was a report from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego that carbon dioxide (CO₂) concentration in the atmosphere peaked above 430 parts per million (ppm). This is significantly above the 350 ppm that climate scientists say is the upper limit if the planet is to avoid catastrophic global warming.

A recent article by journalist and border specialist Tod Miller, posted on the TomDispatch website, explores the interconnection between migration and global climate change. Miller reflects on his experiences of visiting a drought-stricken area of Mexico and his attendance at the 2025 Border Security Expo, a trade show that brings ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) together with private industry or what Miller calls the Border- Industrial Complex.

He says, “Then came the realization that gave me pause: although that devastated Sierra Tarahumara terrain and the Border Security Expo couldn’t be more different, they are, in fact, also intimately connected. After all, Sierra Tarahumara represents the all too palpable and devastating reality of climate change and the way it’s already beginning to displace people, while the Expo represented my country’s most prominent response to that displacement (and the Global North’s more generally). For the United States — increasingly so in the age of Donald Trump — the only answer to the climate crisis and its mass displacement of people is yet more border enforcement.”

Miller notes that the U.S., the largest historic carbon emitter, spends eleven times more on border and immigration enforcement than it does on countering climate change. “U.S. climate policy now boils down to this: reducing fossil fuel extraction and consumption are far less important (if important at all) than the creation of a profitable border and immigration apparatus.”